• Home
  • /
  • Solution
  • /
  • Developing National Evaluation Capacities in Nigeria

Developing National Evaluation Capacities in Nigeria



Challenge

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development calls for follow-up and review processes to measure progress towards achieving the SDGs. It emphasizes that these mechanisms should be based on high quality country-led evaluations and data. Thus, stronger national evaluation capacities are a prerequisite for sustainable development results.

Against this backdrop, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) conducted a bottleneck analysis in 2014 to support the development of a work plan with the Nigerian Ministry of Budget and National Planning (MBNP). In addition to the lack of a National Evaluation Policy (NEP), one of the key barriers identified was the lack of a results-based management culture within the MBNP, specifically, and within the Government, in general. As a result, the Government was unable to advocate effectively for developing the NEP. Furthermore, Nigeria did not have a unified voluntary organizations for professional evaluations (VOPES) that could advocate for and further develop the national evaluation function.

Towards a Solution

UNICEF undertook several strategies to strengthen national evaluation capacities in Nigeria. A key strategy was to raise the profile of the evaluation function within the Government by supporting the establishment of a national evaluation association that would advocate for strengthening the demand for and use of evaluation in decision- making processes. In parallel, UNICEF supported the development and adoption of the NEP.

To achieve this objective, the Government of Nigeria, supported by UNICEF, participated in the Fourth International Conference on National Evaluation Capacities (NEC Conference) in October 2015. The Conference provided the Nigerian Government and, specifically, the Monitoring and Evaluation Director within MBNP, with a platform to: share experiences on building evaluation capacities; engage with evaluation experts and other national VOPES; and share insights into how other countries strengthen evaluation capacities. The government officials also connected with peers working on similar mandates and challenges in terms of strengthening the national evaluation function. Additionally, the Government participated in bilateral exchanges and networks that provided a better understanding of the value of a NEP and of the importance of advocating for it in Nigeria. And, at the same time, this exchange reaffirmed the need for the Nigerian Government to support the development of a national VOPE that would strengthen the overall national evaluation function and support the development and roll-out of the NEP. The key outcome of the NEC Conference was

the Bangkok Declaration on Principles for National Evaluation Capacity for SDGs, which informed Nigeria s strategy for developing a NEP.

Following the participation at the NEC Conference, a conference on evaluation and good governance was held in Abuja in November 2015. The event helped the Ministry to raise the profile of the evaluation agenda within the Government at the highest level and create a collective evaluation vision for Nigeria. It culminated in the important Abuja Declaration on Evaluation (2015), which recognizes the importance of country- led monitoring and evaluation systems for achieving the SDGs in Nigeria.

The Abuja Declaration also helped to establish a vibrant unified national evaluation association in Nigeria. At that time, Nigerian evaluation leaders agreed to unite in a federation of associations known as the Nigerian Association of Evaluators (NAE), which would function as the national VOPE in Nigeria. The NAE aims to further develop and promote a community of evaluators and practitioners that will support the institutionalization of evaluation in Nigeria. UNICEF and MBNP continue to support NAE in organizing annual or biannual conferences to raise the importance of evaluation as an important public management function. Notable among them is the 2017 conference that led the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), MBNP, Office of the Special Adviser to the President on SDGs and UNICEF to sign a declaration that stresses the need for a national accountability framework that further clarifies accountabilities on the monitoring and evaluation functions that support SDG implementation. Following this conference, the Government committed to adopting a monitoring and evaluation framework, for

which two distinct but complementary policies will be developed: a National Monitoring Policy (NMP), planned for 2018, and a NEP, developed in 2017 and ready for domestication. UNICEF is currently supporting the drafting and finalisation of these policies. In the context of the Nigerian Delegation participation to the High-Level Political Forum in 2017, the Nigerian Parliament also asked the Minister of State at MBNP to fast-track adoption of the NEP. Going forward, in 2018 2019, MBNP, UNICEF and the European Union (EU) also agreed to further collaborate in conducting national and subnational consultations to inform the legislative process for both the NEP and NMP.

Nigeria is therefore the first African country to distinguish and recognize the different and complementary roles of two separate functions with two national policies on monitoring and, on evaluation. The NMP approaches the monitoring as a key management function, whereas the NEP approaches evaluation as a core accountability and learning function.

Moreover, during the NEC conference, 27 African countries demonstrated interest in developing a NEP, but very few have developed such a policy. Given this interest, and the fact that many African countries face similar challenges in building an enabling environment for evaluation, Nigeria’s experience and strategy for building national evaluation capacities can be replicated to suit many national contexts.

Countries/Regions involved: Nigeria

Supported by: UNICEF

Contact: Mr. Denis Jobin, Senior Evaluation Specialist, Evaluation Office, UNICEF headquarters, djobin@unicef.org

Project period: 2015 – 2018

Related Post



  • All Post
  • Agriculture and Food Security Publications
  • ATCT Featured Publications POM
  • BAPA+40
  • Blog
  • Capacity Development Initiatives
  • CASS Featured Publications POM
  • CICETE Featured Publications POM
  • CIKD
  • Cities Clusters - Agriculture
  • Cities Clusters - COVID-19
  • Cities Clusters - COVID-19 Knowledge Products
  • Cities Clusters - DRR
  • Cities Clusters - DRR Knowledge Products
  • Cities Clusters - E-commerce
  • Cities Clusters - E-commerce Knowledge Products
  • Cities Clusters - Tourism
  • Cities Clusters - Tourism Knowledge Products
  • Cities Clusters - Transport
  • Cities Clusters - Waste
  • Cities Project
  • Cities Project COVID-19 Newsletters
  • Cities Project COVID-19 Response
  • Cities Project Knowledge Products
  • Classic (untouched)
  • Climate Action
  • Climate Publications
  • COMSATS Featured Publications POM
  • COMSATS Featured Solutions POM
  • Converted from Divi
  • Converted from Mixed
  • Converted from WPBakery
  • COVID-19
  • COVID-19 Page Featured Solutions
  • DRR Knowledge Products
  • DRR News
  • Empty Post
  • ESCWA Featured Publications POM
  • Events
  • FAO Featured Publications POM
  • Featured Event UN-Habitat POM
  • Featured Partner Publications Panama
  • Financing for Development
  • Financing Mechanisms
  • g7+
  • Gender Events
  • Gender News
  • Gender Publications
  • Good Practices in SSTrC Series
  • Good Practices Publications
  • Good Practices Thematic Series & Special Editions
  • Good Practices Vol. 2
  • Good Practices Vol. 3
  • GSSDC
  • Handbook
  • Highlighted
  • Highlighted Publications
  • IAEA Featured Solutions POM
  • IBRAF Featured Publications POM
  • IBSA Fund
  • IBSA Fund Annual Reports
  • IBSA Fund News and Stories
  • IBSA Fund Publication
  • IBSA Fund Story
  • ICGEB Featured Events POM
  • ICGEB Featured Publications POM
  • ICGEB Featured Solutions POM
  • IFAD Featured Publications POM
  • ILO Featured Events POM
  • ILO Featured Publications POM
  • ILO Featured Solutions POM
  • India-UN Development Partnership Fund
  • India-UN Fund Publication
  • India-UN Fund Story
  • IsDB
  • IsDB Featured Publications POM
  • IsDB SCC
  • News
  • Norec Featured Publications POM
  • Norec Featured Solutions POM
  • PAHO Featured Publications POM
  • Peace and Development
  • PGTF Publications
  • PGTF Story
  • PICA Featured News POM
  • PICA Featured Publications POM
  • PICA Featured Solutions POM
  • PIDF Featured Publications POM
  • Policy Brief
  • PPD Featured Publications POM
  • Publications
  • Regional Updates
  • Report
  • Research
  • ROK-UNOSSC Facility
  • SCP Featured Publications POM
  • SGP Featured Publication POM
  • SGP Featured Solutions POM
  • Solution
  • South South in Action
  • South-South Global Thinkers
  • South-South Ideas
  • South-South Ideas Series
  • South-South in Action Series
  • Southern Response to COVID-19
  • SSN4PSI Featured Publications POM
  • SSN4PSI Featured Solutions POM
  • Survey
  • TIKA Featured Publications pom
  • Training
  • UN Day for SSC 2020
  • UN Fund for SSC
  • UN SSC Day Publications
  • UN-Habitat Featured Publications POM
  • UN-HABITAT Featured Solutions POM
  • UNCCT
  • UNCDF Featured Publications POM
  • UNEP Featured Publications POM
  • UNESCAP Featured Publications POM
  • UNESCO Featured Publications POM
  • UNFPA
  • UNFSSC Publication
  • UNFSSC Story
  • UNIDO Featured Publications POM
  • UNIDO Featured Solutions POM
  • UNIDO POM Events
  • UNOCT Featured Publications POM
  • UNOHRLLS Featured Publications POM
  • UNV
  • UNV Featured Publications POM
  • WB Featured Publications POM
  • WB Featured Solutions POM
  • Webinars
  • WFP Featured Events POM
  • WFP Featured Publication POM
  • WFP Featured Solutions POM
  • WIPO
  • Workshops and Seminars
  • Youth4South
  • z Across the Globe 1
  • z Across the Globe 2
  • z Across the Globe 4
  • z Across the Globe 5
  • z Across the Globe 6
  • z Across the Globe 7
  • z Across the Globe 8
  • z ES BAPA+40
  • z ES Eventos
  • z ES Noticias
  • z ES Noticias Destacadas
  • z ES Publicaciones
  • z ES Publicaciones Destacadas
  • z ES Serie Buenas Prácticas en la CSSyT
  • z ES Serie El Sur-Sur en Acción
  • z FR Actualités
  • z FR BAPA+40
  • z FR Événements
  • z FR Publications
  • z FR Publications en vedette
  • z FR Série Bonnes pratiques en CSST
  • z FR Série Sud-Sud en action
  • z Highlighted News
  • z Photos
  • z Videos
  • z ZH BAPA+40
  • z ZH Events
  • z ZH News

Connect with UNOSSC

Stay updated with the latest trends in South-South cooperation and access our vast repository of knowledge.

Copyright © UNOSSC/UNDP

Register

Registration Form (INDIVIDUAL EXPERT)

Use this form to register as an individual expert and become discoverable for knowledge exchange, advisory services, technical support, mentorship, and South-South and triangular cooperation initiatives.

SECTION A. PERSONAL INFORMATION

First name *
Last Name *
Image
Maximum file size: 1 GB
Country of Residence: *
Current Organization/Institution (if applicable):
Position/Title:
Email *
LinkedIn/Professional Profile (optional):
Short professional biography *
CV
Maximum file size: 1 GB

SECTION B. EXPERTISE PROFILE

SDGs
Specific Expertise / Keywords (max. 10 keywords, separate with , ):
Experience in Regions
Experience in Countries

SECTION C. TYPE OF SUPPORT YOU CAN PROVIDE

I am available to provide: (Select all that apply)

SECTION D. PRO-BONO EXPERT SUPPORT

Would you be willing to provide pro bono support to governments, development organizations, UN entities, academia, civil society organizations, or other stakeholders through the platform?

SECTION E. MODALITIES & AVAILABILITY

Mode of support:
Estimated availability:
Indicative level of effort (optional):
SECTION F. SHORT DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT OFFER (Max. 500 characters)

SECTION G. CONSENT & CONDITIONS

I would like my profile to be: *
Consent: *

1. Official name of organization / institution / government entity (exclusions to apply) *
Organizational Logo *
Maximum file size: 2 MB
2. Country *
3. Region *
4. SDGs *
5. Partner category *
6. Website *
7. Which is your Parent organization?
8. Indicate which unit/project/department you work in at your organization. *
9.Industry / sector of your organization *
10. Brief description of your institution (max. 150 words) *
11. Name for the Lead *
12. Title for the Lead *
13. Email address for the Lead *
14. Name for the co-lead
15. Title for the co-lead
16. Email address for the co-lead
17. Due Diligence and Integrity Declaration *

Registration Form (INDIVIDUAL EXPERT)

Use this form to register as an individual expert and become discoverable for knowledge exchange, advisory services, technical support, mentorship, and South-South and triangular cooperation initiatives.

SECTION A. PERSONAL INFORMATION

First name *
Last Name *
Image
Maximum file size: 1 GB
Nationality:
Country of Residence: *
Current Organization/Institution (if applicable):
Position/Title:
Email *
LinkedIn/Professional Profile (optional):
Short professional biography *
CV
Maximum file size: 1 GB

SECTION B. EXPERTISE PROFILE

SDGs
Specific Expertise / Keywords (max. 10 keywords, separate with , ):
Experience in Regions
Experience in Countries

SECTION C. TYPE OF SUPPORT YOU CAN PROVIDE

I am available to provide: (Select all that apply)

SECTION E. MODALITIES & AVAILABILITY

Mode of support:
Estimated availability:
Indicative level of effort (optional):
SECTION F. SHORT DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT OFFER (Max. 500 characters)

SECTION G. CONSENT & CONDITIONS

I would like my profile to be: *
Consent: *

1. Official name of organization / institution / government entity (exclusions to apply) *
Organization logo
Maximum file size: 20 MB
2. Country *
3. Region *
4. SDG *
5. Partner category *
6. Website *
7. Brief description of your institution (max. 150 words) *
8. Name for the Lead *
9. Title for the Lead *
10. Email address for the Lead *
11. Name for the co-lead
12. Title for the co-lead
13. Email address for the co-lead
14. Expression of Interest in the Alliance *
Additional information on proposed areas of engagement may be requested through the platform following initial review by the Alliance Secretariat.
15. Due Diligence and Integrity Declaration *

Submission Note:

  • Submission of this Expression of Interest form does not automatically confer participation in the Alliance.
  • All submissions will be reviewed by the Alliance Secretariat, including basic eligibility screening and proportionate due diligence, as appropriate.
  • Participation in Alliance activities is determined based on relevance to articulated cooperation needs, alignment with Alliance principles, and integrity considerations.
  • Engagement under the Alliance is voluntary, non-binding, and facilitative in nature, and does not constitute funding approval, contractual commitment, or institutional membership.
  • The Alliance Secretariat may contact submitting entities for additional information or clarification during the review process.

Submission of Demand Form

Description of Demand

Indicate the type of support or cooperation requested through the Alliance.
Please briefly describe the challenge, gap, or priority. (Max. 300 words)

Thematic and Geographic Focus

Please indicate the main focus areas of your demand:

A. Thematic Areas (select up to three)
B. Geographic Focus (select all that apply)

Proposed Engagement Modalities

Please indicate how you would like to engage through the Alliance (select all that apply):

Expected Outcomes

Please indicate the main results you seek to achieve through this engagement. (Max. 200 words)
Examples:
• Capacity strengthened
• Partnerships established
• Sectoral or regional strategies co-developed
• Solutions piloted
• Knowledge generated
• Policies informed

Timeline and Readiness (if applicable)

1. Expected timeframe for engagement:
2. Current stage:

Additional Information

Please provide any additional information, documents, or links relevant to this submission.
(Max. 200 words or upload link)

Submission of Offer Form

Description of Contribution

Indicate the type of contribution your institution can provide and describe the expertise, resources, or solutions you may offer.
Please briefly describe your proposed contribution. (Max. 300 words)

Thematic and Geographic Focus

Please indicate the main focus areas of your interest:

A. Thematic Areas (select up to three)
B. Geographic Focus (select all that apply)

Proposed Engagement Modalities

Please indicate how you would like to engage through the Alliance (select all that apply):

Expected Outcomes

Please indicate the main results you aim to achieve through this engagement. (Max. 200 words)
Examples:
• Capacity strengthened
• Partnerships established
• Sectoral or regional strategies co-developed
• Solutions piloted
• Knowledge generated
• Policies informed

Timeline and Readiness (if applicable)

1. Expected timeframe for engagement:
2. Current stage:

Additional Information

Please provide any additional information, documents, or links relevant to this submission.
(Max. 200 words or upload link)

Organization Registration

Authentication & Due Diligence This prototype simulates identity verification, due diligence confirmation, and an authentication step before submission. *

First Name *
Last Name *
Email address *
Password *
Confirm Password *
Name of institution / organization *
Country / Region *
Organization Type *
Organization other *
Function / role *
Organization logo *
Maximum file size: 1 GB

Login

Login / email *
Password *
Remember me

Forgot password?

Connect form

Your name *
Email *
Organization / institution *
Job title / role *
Reason for connecting:
Short message

Add Knowledge Product

A. Publication Basics (Mandatory)

Exact Title of the Publication *
Featured image *
Maximum file size: 2 MB
Executive Summary *
Publication Available Online *
Direct Link to Publication

B. Publication Details

Subtitle
Publication Type *
Year of Publication *
Authors / Editors
Key Messages

C. Organizations

Partner Organizations

D. Discoverability (Optional)

Keywords *
SDGs *
Geographic Coverage *
Countries *

Add Good Practice

My form is: *

SECTION 1. BASIC INFORMATION

Title of the Good Practice *
A South-South cooperation good practice is a documented experience, approach, methodology or initiative that has produced positive results, generated useful lessons, and demonstrated relevance for other countries or institutions facing similar development challenges. A good practice should be credible, evidence-based, contextually explained, and useful for learning, policy dialogue, adaptation or scaling.
Name of the Solution(s) *
A South-South cooperation solution is a concrete, tested or implementable policy, programme, technology, institutional model, service, financing mechanism, methodology or partnership approach developed or applied by countries and institutions of the Global South, which responds to a clearly identified development challenge and has potential to be adapted, replicated or scaled in other contexts through South-South or triangular cooperation.
Short Summary *
max. 60 words
Lead Implementing Institution *
Partner Institutions *
Countries / Territories Involved *
Regions Involved *
Type of Cooperation *

SECTION 2. DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT & SDG ALIGNMENT

Primary SDG(s) Addressed *
SDG Target(s) *
Secondary SDGs (if applicable)
Development Challenge Addressed *
100–150 words

SECTION 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE GOOD PRACTICE & SOLUTION

Objectives of the Good Practice / Solution *
max. 100 words
Description of the Solution(s) *
max. 300 words
Innovation Dimension *
max. 150 words

SECTION 4. SOUTH-SOUTH & TRIANGULAR COOPERATION VALUE

South-South Knowledge Exchange *
max. 200 words
Role of Triangular Partners (if applicable)

SECTION 5. PARTICIPATION & GOVERNANCE

Were participatory approaches used in the design and implementation of the solution? If yes, describe the stakeholders involved (e.g., beneficiaries, communities, civil society, private sector, government agencies) *
max. 150 words
What governance and institutional arrangements supported the implementation of this solution? Please describe the roles and responsibilities of key institutions and any collaboration with government entities, development partners, civil society, academia, or the private sector *

SECTION 6. PRODUCED IMPACT (Partner-Validated)

Description of Produced Impact *
max. 250 words
Quantitative Results *
Please provide measurable results achieved through the solution.
Quantitative Results
Please provide measurable results achieved through the solution.
Qualitative Results *
Please describe the most significant qualitative changes resulting from the solution.
Qualitative Results
Please describe the most significant qualitative changes resulting from the solution.

Timeframe of Impact

Timeframe of Impact of the solution: *

SECTION 7. SUSTAINABILITY & SCALABILITY

7.1 What measures have been taken to ensure the sustainability of the good practice beyond the project or intervention period? *
Please describe institutional, financial, policy, technical, community ownership, or capacity-building measures that support long-term sustainability. (max. 150 words)
7.2 Is the solution replicable and adaptable in other contexts? *
Please explain whether the solution can be adapted or replicated in different countries, regions, sectors, communities, or development settings. Highlight any enabling conditions or prerequisites. (max. 150 words)

SECTION 8. RISKS & LESSONS LEARNED

Key Risks and Mitigation Measures
max. 100 words
Lessons Learned *
max. 150 words

SECTION 9. RESOURCES & EVIDENCE

Supporting Materials *
Maximum file size: 1 GB
manuals, toolkits, evaluations, media
URL of the Good Practice / Solution *
Please provide URLs to publicly available resources that demonstrate, validate, or document the good practice. Examples include: Project or programme website/microsite, published evaluation report, case study, knowledge product, policy document, news article or media coverage, technical report, blog or publication etc.
URL of the Solution *
Please provide URLs to publicly available resources that demonstrate, validate, or document the solution. Examples include: Project or programme website/microsite, published evaluation report, case study, knowledge product, policy document, news article or media coverage, technical report, blog or publication etc.
Additional URLs (optional)

SECTION 10. CONTACT INFORMATION & VALIDATION

Focal Point – Partner Institution (Impact Validation)

Name *
Title *
Organization *
Email *
Declaration *

Scroll to Top