Management Capacity Enhancement of the South Sudan Urban Water Corporation

Improving urban water supply in South Sudan

Challenges

South Sudan became independent in 2011 after a long conflict. The population of Juba, the capital city, increased dramatically after the return of refugees and is now estimated at 600,000- 800,000. Infrastructure challenges, such as water supply, create a major challenge for daily life.The coverage of water supply in the city is barely 10 per cent. A small minority of citizens with access to water with service connection pay the lower fixed water tariff, while the majority rely on unfiltered river water, unprotected wells and/or high salinity water. The South Sudan Urban Water Corporation (SSUWC), a water utility responsible for the construction and management of water supply facilities and housed within the Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation (MWRI), is financially and technically unsustainable due to the high non-revenue water (NRW) ratio and the low water tariff collection ratio. Since it is necessary to increase the tariff and tariff collection ratio, SSUWC must improve its performance and customer service to obtain understanding and cooperation from citizens.

Toward a Solution

To enhance the SSUWC’s capacity to deliver safe and clean water supply in a sustainable manner in Juba, since 2010 the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and South Sudan have been implementing the Project for Management Capacity Enhancement of South Sudan Urban Water Corporation. Phase 2 (2016-2020) of the project focuses on capacity development with regard to financial management, NRW management, and facilities operation and maintenance.

JICA supports SSUWC to learn from Uganda’s and Cambodia’s major water utilities. The objective of training sessions in each country are for SSUWC to:

  • learn what worked well for water utility reforms from those two countries? experiences; and
  • gain the expertise needed to draft its reform plan based on its own situation.

Training in Cambodia, Japan, and Uganda, in 2017 was conducted as one of the project activities. The trainings included learning from major water utilities in developing countries (the National Water and Sewerage Corporation (NWSC) in Uganda, and the Phnom Penh Water Supply Authority (PPWSA) in Cambodia) about their successful experiences with reforms and the challenges of infrastructure development. Both NWSC and PPWSA have achieved substantial improvements in performance and successful organizational change, despite working in harsh environments. For example, the NRW ratio of PPWSA and NWSC improved significantly, from 72 per cent in 1993 to 6 per cent in 2011 and from 60 per cent in 1998 to 28 per cent in 2018, respectively. Participants learned about Cambodia’s history (e.g. deteriorated infrastructure due to the civil war in the 1970s), which was similar to the situation in South Sudan.

The Minister of Water Resources and Irrigation and key SSUWC officials visited major water utilities in Uganda and Cambodia. The Uganda training was based on the training programme of the NWSC and its water supply facilities. NWSC lectures and training covered a wide range of management topics, such as water tariffs, financial management, public awareness-raising, NRW management, geographic information system (GIS), water distribution management and sharing the reform history of NWSC. PPWSA lectured on its reform history and utility management.

The Minister of Water Resources and Irrigation and SSUWC gained confidence in their reform plan. In Cambodia, the coverage of water supply in Phnom Penh increased dramatically, from 20 per cent in 1993 to 82 per cent in 2003, with a reduction of NRW and tariff revision, resulting in a net profit. The PPWSA (Cambodia) reform plan was implemented in just over 10 years, showing that reforms can be achieved fairly quickly. The lectures were persuasive because most of them were given by PPWSA executives who had experienced tough challenges since the 1990s. They concurred that it was possible for SSUWC to improve its performance and expand water supply coverage.

Continuous, joint training with NWSC will be effective in strengthening SSUWC’s performance. Since the technology and management methods of the neighbouring country are similar to that of South Sudan, it is easier for participants from SSUWC to learn from NWSC’s experiences.

Achievements:

  • SSUWC headquarters and Juba station have begun to draft a reform action plan, which includes an analysis of good practices and lessons learned from PPWSA and NWSC (e.g. the need for political will, strong leadership, motivated staff and support from development partners and peers).

The overall outputs of the training were:

  • a reform plan for improved utility performance and identification of priority actions that contribute to efficient and effective improvements, based on the experiences of major water utilities in developing countries and lessons learned from them;
  • practical skills and management methods shared by a neighbouring country; and linkages between organizations in different developing countries with the support of development partners (such as JICA in this case),that understand the challenges and the development process of developing countries and have established a good relationship with them.
  •  
CONTACT INFORMATION
Office for Global Issues and Development Partnership, Operations Strategy Department, Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
SDG
06 - Clean Water and Sanitation
SUPPORTED BY
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)

ABOUT

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Disclosures

RESOURCES

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Disclosures

ENGAGE

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Disclosures

Copyright © UNOSSC/UNDP

wpChatIcon
wpChatIcon

Alliance Application Form

Submit an Expression of Interest and/or Demand Signal. UNOSSC reviews submissions on a rolling basis.

1. Official name of organization / institution / government entity (exclusions to apply) *
2. Country *
3. Region *
4. SDG *
Secondary SDG *
5. Partner category *
6. Website *
7. Brief description of your institution (max. 150 words) *
Name for the Lead *
Title for the Lead *
Email address for the Lead *
Name for the co-lead
Title for the co-lead
Email address for the co-lead
Section 3. Expression of Interest in the Alliance *
Additional information on proposed areas of engagement may be requested through the platform following initial review by the Alliance Secretariat.
Section 4. Due Diligence and Integrity Declaration *

Submission Note:

  • Submission of this Expression of Interest form does not automatically confer participation in the Alliance.
  • All submissions will be reviewed by the Alliance Secretariat, including basic eligibility screening and proportionate due diligence, as appropriate.
  • Participation in Alliance activities is determined based on relevance to articulated cooperation needs, alignment with Alliance principles, and integrity considerations.
  • Engagement under the Alliance is voluntary, non-binding, and facilitative in nature, and does not constitute funding approval, contractual commitment, or institutional membership.
  • The Alliance Secretariat may contact submitting entities for additional information or clarification during the review process.

Submission of Demand Form

Description of Demand

Indicate the type of support or cooperation requested through the Alliance.
Please briefly describe the challenge, gap, or priority. (Max. 300 words)

Thematic and Geographic Focus

Please indicate the main focus areas of your demand:

A. Thematic Areas (select up to three)
B. Geographic Focus (select all that apply)

Proposed Engagement Modalities

Please indicate how you would like to engage through the Alliance (select all that apply):

Expected Outcomes

Please indicate the main results you seek to achieve through this engagement. (Max. 200 words)
Examples:
• Capacity strengthened
• Partnerships established
• Sectoral or regional strategies co-developed
• Solutions piloted
• Knowledge generated
• Policies informed

Timeline and Readiness (if applicable)

1. Expected timeframe for engagement:
2. Current stage:

Additional Information

Please provide any additional information, documents, or links relevant to this submission.
(Max. 200 words or upload link)

Submission of Offer Form

Description of Contribution

Indicate the type of contribution your institution can provide and describe the expertise, resources, or solutions you may offer.
Please briefly describe your proposed contribution. (Max. 300 words)

Thematic and Geographic Focus

Please indicate the main focus areas of your interest:

A. Thematic Areas (select up to three)
B. Geographic Focus (select all that apply)

Proposed Engagement Modalities

Please indicate how you would like to engage through the Alliance (select all that apply):

Expected Outcomes

Please indicate the main results you aim to achieve through this engagement. (Max. 200 words)
Examples:
• Capacity strengthened
• Partnerships established
• Sectoral or regional strategies co-developed
• Solutions piloted
• Knowledge generated
• Policies informed

Timeline and Readiness (if applicable)

1. Expected timeframe for engagement:
2. Current stage:

Additional Information

Please provide any additional information, documents, or links relevant to this submission.
(Max. 200 words or upload link)

Organization Registration

Authentication & Due Diligence This prototype simulates identity verification, due diligence confirmation, and an authentication step before submission. *

First Name *
Last Name *
Email address *
Password *
Confirm Password *
Name of institution / organization *
Country / Region *
Organization Type *
Organization other *
Function / role *
Organization logo *
Maximum file size: 1 GB

Login

Login / email *
Password *
Remember me

Forgot password?

Connect form

Your name *
Email *
Organization / institution *
Job title / role *
Reason for connecting:
Short message

Scroll to Top