South-South Cooperation for Advancing the 2030 Agenda: A study in Barbados and Jamaica

Fostering partnerships to advance the implementation of the 2030 Agenda and SAMOA Pathway

Challenges

In Barbados and Jamaica, national advances towards achieving the 2030 Agenda have been severely threatened by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The main challenges associated with South-South cooperation in both countries were identified as difficulties in tracking and quantifying technical cooperation activity and the need for appropriate methodologies and procedures to man- age information gaps. Systems have not yet been developed to record, quantify, measure and evaluate the impact of such cooperation and much more could be done to consider the political value of South-South cooperation.

Toward a Solution

Under the Caribbean First Strategy of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), the Commission gives a prominent place to the Caribbean to better serve its member countries and address their specific needs and vulnerability. In this context, and in response to resolution 675 (XXXIV) of ECLAC, the Commission conducted a study on the evaluation of South-South cooperation in Barbados and Jamaica to share knowledge, experiences and best practices.

The main objective of the study was to examine how South-South cooperation has been implemented in Barbados and Jamaica in order to launch a broader discussion on the potential of such cooperation and foster partnerships to advance the implementation of the 2030 Agenda and the SAMOA Pathway in the region in such an unprecedented crisis as the COVID-19 pandemic.

The study includes conclusions and recommendations concerning the lessons learned that may be of broader interest to the countries of Latin America and the Caribbean. In fact, Barbados and Jamaica illustrate the extent to which a country’s sense of national identity, its foreign policy and its development agenda will shape its attitudes towards South-South cooperation. Despite having similar historical backgrounds and development concerns in the 1960s, which resulted in significant joint regional initiatives, the two States demonstrated somewhat different foreign policy visions and directions.

South-South cooperation is a significant process in both countries that adds value to their development activities. Jamaica’s engagements are on a larger scale and are more institutionalized than is the case of Barbados, where South-South cooperation has been conservatively defined and its scope more cautiously delimited. Jamaica has reached the point at which it is both a beneficiary of, and a contributor to, South-South cooperation. The experiences of Barbados demonstrate that it has played a contributory part and can assume more proactive roles in such cooperation.

It was found that much more could be done in both countries in terms of exploring the full potential of South-South cooperation. Both countries need to strengthen and consolidate their institutional capacity to document and archive all their development cooperation, disaggregate the different categories of cooperation, analyse the data, evaluate the development impacts of their South-South cooperation and use the findings to inform future policy.

The advanced version of the study was presented on 11 December 2020 by ECLAC during a virtual Expert Group Meeting on the Evaluation of South-South cooperation in the Caribbean in the context of the post-pandemic recovery. The online format facilitated wide participation in the meeting that included 22 Member States and associate members of ECLAC, representatives of the CARICOM Secretariat, the United Nations Office of South-South cooperation, the Latin American and Caribbean Economic System and academia.

The study was very well received by member countries and by the invited experts. It generated a stimulating discussion on the current val- ue and the untapped potential of, and further opportunities for, harnessing South-South and triangular cooperation in the ongoing work to achieve Agenda 2030 in the Caribbean and also the agenda of the Small Island Developing States (SIDS). During the meeting, Colombia offered to share its methodology for evaluating South-South cooperation with Caribbean countries. Other Caribbean governments request- ed to be part of a follow-up study to assess the potential of South-South, SIDS-SIDS and triangular cooperation in their respective countries. The study will be published and made available online and a follow-up online meeting will be organized in 2021 to broaden the scope of the discussions and foster the exchanges of good practices that could lead to cooperation agreements and other forms of regional collaboration.

As the attendees of the Expert Group Meeting realized, South-South co-operation holds possibilities that go way beyond traditional notions of technical cooperation. South-South cooperation partnerships should be used to explore new approaches to development financing, including debt swaps, public and private partnerships and other options. Likewise, many Southern actors, in Latin America and elsewhere are emerging as significant new partners in scientific and technological innovations, including in the areas of digital technologies. Relevant centres of expertise should be explored not only in those sectors but also in addressing ongoing social policy challenges that face the Caribbean subregion.

CONTACT INFORMATION
Mr. Luis Yáñez Secretary of the Commission Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)
SDG
17 - Partnerships for the Goals
SUPPORTED BY
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)

ABOUT

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Disclosures

RESOURCES

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Disclosures

ENGAGE

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Disclosures

Copyright © UNOSSC/UNDP

wpChatIcon
wpChatIcon

Alliance Application Form

Submit an Expression of Interest and/or Demand Signal. UNOSSC reviews submissions on a rolling basis.

1. Official name of organization / institution / government entity (exclusions to apply) *
2. Country *
3. Region *
4. SDG *
Secondary SDG *
5. Partner category *
6. Website *
7. Brief description of your institution (max. 150 words) *
Name for the Lead *
Title for the Lead *
Email address for the Lead *
Name for the co-lead
Title for the co-lead
Email address for the co-lead
Section 3. Expression of Interest in the Alliance *
Additional information on proposed areas of engagement may be requested through the platform following initial review by the Alliance Secretariat.
Section 4. Due Diligence and Integrity Declaration *

Submission Note:

  • Submission of this Expression of Interest form does not automatically confer participation in the Alliance.
  • All submissions will be reviewed by the Alliance Secretariat, including basic eligibility screening and proportionate due diligence, as appropriate.
  • Participation in Alliance activities is determined based on relevance to articulated cooperation needs, alignment with Alliance principles, and integrity considerations.
  • Engagement under the Alliance is voluntary, non-binding, and facilitative in nature, and does not constitute funding approval, contractual commitment, or institutional membership.
  • The Alliance Secretariat may contact submitting entities for additional information or clarification during the review process.

Submission of Demand Form

Description of Demand

Indicate the type of support or cooperation requested through the Alliance.
Please briefly describe the challenge, gap, or priority. (Max. 300 words)

Thematic and Geographic Focus

Please indicate the main focus areas of your demand:

A. Thematic Areas (select up to three)
B. Geographic Focus (select all that apply)

Proposed Engagement Modalities

Please indicate how you would like to engage through the Alliance (select all that apply):

Expected Outcomes

Please indicate the main results you seek to achieve through this engagement. (Max. 200 words)
Examples:
• Capacity strengthened
• Partnerships established
• Sectoral or regional strategies co-developed
• Solutions piloted
• Knowledge generated
• Policies informed

Timeline and Readiness (if applicable)

1. Expected timeframe for engagement:
2. Current stage:

Additional Information

Please provide any additional information, documents, or links relevant to this submission.
(Max. 200 words or upload link)

Submission of Offer Form

Description of Contribution

Indicate the type of contribution your institution can provide and describe the expertise, resources, or solutions you may offer.
Please briefly describe your proposed contribution. (Max. 300 words)

Thematic and Geographic Focus

Please indicate the main focus areas of your interest:

A. Thematic Areas (select up to three)
B. Geographic Focus (select all that apply)

Proposed Engagement Modalities

Please indicate how you would like to engage through the Alliance (select all that apply):

Expected Outcomes

Please indicate the main results you aim to achieve through this engagement. (Max. 200 words)
Examples:
• Capacity strengthened
• Partnerships established
• Sectoral or regional strategies co-developed
• Solutions piloted
• Knowledge generated
• Policies informed

Timeline and Readiness (if applicable)

1. Expected timeframe for engagement:
2. Current stage:

Additional Information

Please provide any additional information, documents, or links relevant to this submission.
(Max. 200 words or upload link)

Organization Registration

Authentication & Due Diligence This prototype simulates identity verification, due diligence confirmation, and an authentication step before submission. *

First Name *
Last Name *
Email address *
Password *
Confirm Password *
Name of institution / organization *
Country / Region *
Organization Type *
Organization other *
Function / role *
Organization logo *
Maximum file size: 1 GB

Login

Login / email *
Password *
Remember me

Forgot password?

Connect form

Your name *
Email *
Organization / institution *
Job title / role *
Reason for connecting:
Short message

Scroll to Top