Strengthening Governance for Nutrition

Improving governance for food security and nutrition within the framework of the Guatemala Zero Hunger Plan through the exchange and adaptation of experiences

Challenges

Guatemala suffers from high food insecurity and chronic undernutrition, and its local government and community leaders have limited awareness of food and nutrition security issues. As a result, these crucial issues are not reflected in local decision-making. Meanwhile in the same region, Chile has successfully addressed child undernutrition since the 1940s. Its success can be attributed to a political and technical consensus that has allowed the integration and sustaining of policies over time, based on laws and regulations relating to prevention, treatment and control.

Toward a Solution

In 2013 and 2014, Chile partnered with the World Food Programme (WFP) to create the Strengthening Governance for Nutrition Initiative to assist Guatemala with this challenge. The objective of the Initiative was to support the implementation of the Guatemala Zero Hunger Plan and generate participatory mechanisms at the community and local levels to improve child nutrition – focusing on the critical window of opportunity for preventing undernutrition that exists during the 1,000 days between conception and a child’s second year of life – and to strengthen governance for food security and nutrition.

Chile and Guatemala jointly designed the project with WFP support and guidance. Consensus was reached through information exchanges. A preliminary work plan was forged based on the national priorities in the Guatemala Zero Hunger Plan. The project also carried out a gap analysis exercise. The analysis revealed that Guatemala had low local empowerment for food and nutrition security. Chile had the methodologies and capacities needed to transfer its own experience. Chile’s experience in child nutrition is considered a success because it has achieved outcomes that are verifiable, particularly those for capacity-building.

The implementation phase of the project followed a participatory approach at the national and local levels aimed at improving local management capacities and coordination and at defining the roles and responsibilities of the different food and nutrition interventions within the established legal and regulatory frameworks. In order to strengthen food and nutrition security in the San Carlos Alzatate and Jalapa municipalities, Chilean experts outlined the following methodological approach:

  1. 1. Provide project information to local authorities
  2. Recruit and induct local managers
  3. Map actors
  4. Systematize, analyse and approve the mapping of actors.
  5. Conduct workshops
  6. Design community action plans
  7. Develop the final project report
  8. Present results to the National Commission on Food and Nutrition Security.

The latest reports of the Guatemalan Secretariat for Food Security and Nutrition indicated that the Government had validated the project model. The model is in alignment with the new national strategy, 2016-2020, that the Secretariat for Food Security and Nutrition will coordinate.

The participatory approach ensured direct involvement of community and institutional actors in the development of the action plans. The model and methodology also fed into the Secretariat-led communications strategy for development in food security and nutrition.

The sustainable elements of the project included: (1) alignment with national priorities, laid out in the Guatemala Zero Hunger Plan; (2) verifiable outcomes; (3) strengthening of methodologies and capacities in the recipient country; and (4) development of effective transfer and exchanges.

Replication depends on: (a) creating a technical group at the central level to support local-level planning and implementation of each component of the action plans; (b) monitoring implementation of the action plans; and (c) conducting evaluations and expanding the model to the rest of the country.

The project target groups included local political authorities, local implementing authorities and community leaders: women’s associations, local farmer associations, and local representatives from schools and churches. Beneficiaries included local communities, local political authorities, local implementing authorities and

national authorities linked to food and nutrition security (the Secretariat for Food Security and Nutrition and the Ministry of Public Health and Social Assistance). Users and partners included local political authorities (governor, mayor, and development council), the municipal development council, the community development council, food security and nutrition commissions, health centres, the ministries of agriculture, social development and education, the University Centre, the Secretariat for Food Security and Nutrition, and the Ministry of Public HealthandSocialAssistance.

Chile was the main donor. Implementing partners included the Chilean Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, the Chilean Corporation for Child Nutrition and WFP. UNICEF participated in some workshops and meetings and was interested in using the methodology for its communications strategy.

CONTACT INFORMATION
Mr. Marco Antonio Monzon, SESAN | Mr. Mario Touchette, WFP Guatemala Country Office | Ms. María Teresa Oyarzún, Technical Coordinator, Chilean Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology (INTA) Mr. Arturo Vergara, Chilean International Cooperation Agency (AGCI) | Ms. María Pino, WFP Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean
SDG
02 - Zero Hunger
SUPPORTED BY
World Food Programme (WFP)

ABOUT

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Disclosures

RESOURCES

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Disclosures

ENGAGE

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Disclosures

Copyright © UNOSSC/UNDP

wpChatIcon
wpChatIcon

Alliance Application Form

Submit an Expression of Interest and/or Demand Signal. UNOSSC reviews submissions on a rolling basis.

1. Official name of organization / institution / government entity (exclusions to apply) *
2. Country *
3. Region *
4. SDG *
Secondary SDG *
5. Partner category *
6. Website *
7. Brief description of your institution (max. 150 words) *
Name for the Lead *
Title for the Lead *
Email address for the Lead *
Name for the co-lead
Title for the co-lead
Email address for the co-lead
Section 3. Expression of Interest in the Alliance *
Additional information on proposed areas of engagement may be requested through the platform following initial review by the Alliance Secretariat.
Section 4. Due Diligence and Integrity Declaration *

Submission Note:

  • Submission of this Expression of Interest form does not automatically confer participation in the Alliance.
  • All submissions will be reviewed by the Alliance Secretariat, including basic eligibility screening and proportionate due diligence, as appropriate.
  • Participation in Alliance activities is determined based on relevance to articulated cooperation needs, alignment with Alliance principles, and integrity considerations.
  • Engagement under the Alliance is voluntary, non-binding, and facilitative in nature, and does not constitute funding approval, contractual commitment, or institutional membership.
  • The Alliance Secretariat may contact submitting entities for additional information or clarification during the review process.

Submission of Demand Form

Description of Demand

Indicate the type of support or cooperation requested through the Alliance.
Please briefly describe the challenge, gap, or priority. (Max. 300 words)

Thematic and Geographic Focus

Please indicate the main focus areas of your demand:

A. Thematic Areas (select up to three)
B. Geographic Focus (select all that apply)

Proposed Engagement Modalities

Please indicate how you would like to engage through the Alliance (select all that apply):

Expected Outcomes

Please indicate the main results you seek to achieve through this engagement. (Max. 200 words)
Examples:
• Capacity strengthened
• Partnerships established
• Sectoral or regional strategies co-developed
• Solutions piloted
• Knowledge generated
• Policies informed

Timeline and Readiness (if applicable)

1. Expected timeframe for engagement:
2. Current stage:

Additional Information

Please provide any additional information, documents, or links relevant to this submission.
(Max. 200 words or upload link)

Submission of Offer Form

Description of Contribution

Indicate the type of contribution your institution can provide and describe the expertise, resources, or solutions you may offer.
Please briefly describe your proposed contribution. (Max. 300 words)

Thematic and Geographic Focus

Please indicate the main focus areas of your interest:

A. Thematic Areas (select up to three)
B. Geographic Focus (select all that apply)

Proposed Engagement Modalities

Please indicate how you would like to engage through the Alliance (select all that apply):

Expected Outcomes

Please indicate the main results you aim to achieve through this engagement. (Max. 200 words)
Examples:
• Capacity strengthened
• Partnerships established
• Sectoral or regional strategies co-developed
• Solutions piloted
• Knowledge generated
• Policies informed

Timeline and Readiness (if applicable)

1. Expected timeframe for engagement:
2. Current stage:

Additional Information

Please provide any additional information, documents, or links relevant to this submission.
(Max. 200 words or upload link)

Organization Registration

Authentication & Due Diligence This prototype simulates identity verification, due diligence confirmation, and an authentication step before submission. *

First Name *
Last Name *
Email address *
Password *
Confirm Password *
Name of institution / organization *
Country / Region *
Organization Type *
Organization other *
Function / role *
Organization logo *
Maximum file size: 1 GB

Login

Login / email *
Password *
Remember me

Forgot password?

Connect form

Your name *
Email *
Organization / institution *
Job title / role *
Reason for connecting:
Short message

Scroll to Top