Strengthening STEM Curricula for Girls in Africa, Asia and the Pacific

Encouraging female participation in science, technology, engineering and mathematics

Challenges

Across the world, women are undeniably more likely than men to be uneducated or undereducated, and statistics show particularly low levels of participation for girls in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) throughout all levels of schooling. Despite decades of development interventions that focus on science and technology, the gender gap continues to widen in STEM fields. Country interventions focusing on curricular reforms that emphasize the practical, social, environmental and global objectives of STEM, in addition to the technical aspects, have demonstrated positive effects on female participation. These approaches alter pedagogy to allow for hands-on engagement, self-learning and collaboration and offer varied examples across gender, race, culture and class lines.  

 

Acquiring knowledge about STEM is not only a basic human right; it is also a critical condition for sustainable development, participatory citizenship and providing skills for the future of work. Women’s engagement in science and technology stimulates innovation and benefits their domestic and community work in agriculture, cooking, clean water, sanitation and healthcare. Nevertheless, statistics show relatively low levels of female participation in STEM in schooling and employment across the worldWomen make up 33?percent of researchers in Africa and 18?percent in Asia and the PacificGiven these statistics, the success of Malaysia is salientWomen constitute over half of the student population studying technology in higher education and greater percentage in the professional information and communications technology (ICT) sector. 

Toward a Solution

The project entitled Strengthening STEM Curricula for Girls in Africa, Asia and Pacific aimed to increase female knowledge and engagement in STEM education by strengthening its gender responsiveness. The project united four participating countries from Africa (Kenya and Nigeria) and Asia and the Pacific (Cambodia and Viet Nam). Malaysian expertise and experience were essential to developing and strengthening existing STEM policies, curricula and pedagogy within these countries. The project intended to foster and build the institutional capacities of various ministers, decision makers, curriculum developers, planners and educators, with a view to designing and implementing gender-responsive, quality STEM curricula across the education system within a holistic vision.  

 

Within this project, 11?activities were organized in collaboration with a number of local and international partners. Key components included a needs assessment workshop, in-country activities (policy dialogue, capacity-building trainings, working sessions, consultation meetings), a capacity development workshop and the development of training tools. 

 

This initiative made crucial contributions to the Sustainable Development Goals and the Education 2030?Agenda in ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education and promoting lifelong learning for all. 

 

The implementation of the first phase was planned in collaboration with the Ministry of Education (MoE) of Malaysia; the Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organisation Regional Centre for Education in Science and Mathematics, under the Regional Centre for Education in Science and Mathematics (SEAMEO-RECSAM); and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) offices in Bangkok, Nairobi, Ha Noi and Phnom Penh. This collaboration was indispensable in connecting various experts to ensure the project’s impact and sustainability. Two activities were held for the entire group: a needs assessment workshop and capacity development workshopDrawing from Malaysian expertise and experience, country teams could contextualize their situation and suggest practical training tools to promote gender-responsive STEM education in their country.  

 

As a result of these two activities, the International Bureau of Education (IBE) delivered two knowledge products: Sharing Malaysian experience in participation of girls in STEM education and Training Tools for Curriculum Development: A Resource Pack for Gender-Responsive STEM Education. These two documents were later used as key training tools for the capacity development workshop and in engaging with other countries activities. By uniting their strengths, these countries were able to conduct a more specific analysis to overcome challenges.  

 

Both workshops were organized by MoE Malaysia, SEAMEO-RECSAM and IBE. Workshops involved various experts from the beneficiary countries, as well as Cameroon, Malaysia and UNESCO Bangkok. Experts in international curriculum and gender also attendedWith their help, each country team produced a national STEM situational analysis and a road map for in-country interventions. 

 

As a result of these activities, each participating country identified its gaps in mainstream, gender-responsive STEM education. Once needs and priorities were defined, a combination of policy dialogue and capacity development workshops were held. A resource pack for gender-responsive STEM education was also produced to help develop adequate tools to implement modifications. It is structured around six modules: policy, curricula, pedagogy, teachers teaching and learning resources, and community issues. Participating countries made noticeable progress in that regard. 

 

Given the progress made, IBE requested an 8-month, no-cost extension in order to ensure the project’s implementation and expected outcomes, which the donor approved. In addition, Viet Nam replaced Indonesia as a beneficiary country. The partnerships between countries and experts further ensured the projects impact, sustainability and monitoring.  

 

The degree of commitment that each country made to gender-responsive STEM education depended on its national aspirations and educational plan, as well as its socio-political status. In order to help countries identify the gender gap in STEM fields, they may request and participate in policy and technical dialogues and capacity development trainings to reassess their educational policies, curriculapedagogyteacher education and professional development. 

CONTACT INFORMATION
Organization: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Jakarta
SDG
04 - Quality Education
COUNTRIES INVOLVED
France
SUPPORTED BY
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)

ABOUT

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Disclosures

RESOURCES

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Disclosures

ENGAGE

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Disclosures

Copyright © UNOSSC/UNDP

wpChatIcon
wpChatIcon

Alliance Application Form

Submit an Expression of Interest and/or Demand Signal. UNOSSC reviews submissions on a rolling basis.

1. Official name of organization / institution / government entity (exclusions to apply) *
2. Country *
3. Region *
4. SDG *
Secondary SDG *
5. Partner category *
6. Website *
7. Brief description of your institution (max. 150 words) *
Name for the Lead *
Title for the Lead *
Email address for the Lead *
Name for the co-lead
Title for the co-lead
Email address for the co-lead
Section 3. Expression of Interest in the Alliance *
Additional information on proposed areas of engagement may be requested through the platform following initial review by the Alliance Secretariat.
Section 4. Due Diligence and Integrity Declaration *

Submission Note:

  • Submission of this Expression of Interest form does not automatically confer participation in the Alliance.
  • All submissions will be reviewed by the Alliance Secretariat, including basic eligibility screening and proportionate due diligence, as appropriate.
  • Participation in Alliance activities is determined based on relevance to articulated cooperation needs, alignment with Alliance principles, and integrity considerations.
  • Engagement under the Alliance is voluntary, non-binding, and facilitative in nature, and does not constitute funding approval, contractual commitment, or institutional membership.
  • The Alliance Secretariat may contact submitting entities for additional information or clarification during the review process.

Submission of Demand Form

Description of Demand

Indicate the type of support or cooperation requested through the Alliance.
Please briefly describe the challenge, gap, or priority. (Max. 300 words)

Thematic and Geographic Focus

Please indicate the main focus areas of your demand:

A. Thematic Areas (select up to three)
B. Geographic Focus (select all that apply)

Proposed Engagement Modalities

Please indicate how you would like to engage through the Alliance (select all that apply):

Expected Outcomes

Please indicate the main results you seek to achieve through this engagement. (Max. 200 words)
Examples:
• Capacity strengthened
• Partnerships established
• Sectoral or regional strategies co-developed
• Solutions piloted
• Knowledge generated
• Policies informed

Timeline and Readiness (if applicable)

1. Expected timeframe for engagement:
2. Current stage:

Additional Information

Please provide any additional information, documents, or links relevant to this submission.
(Max. 200 words or upload link)

Submission of Offer Form

Description of Contribution

Indicate the type of contribution your institution can provide and describe the expertise, resources, or solutions you may offer.
Please briefly describe your proposed contribution. (Max. 300 words)

Thematic and Geographic Focus

Please indicate the main focus areas of your interest:

A. Thematic Areas (select up to three)
B. Geographic Focus (select all that apply)

Proposed Engagement Modalities

Please indicate how you would like to engage through the Alliance (select all that apply):

Expected Outcomes

Please indicate the main results you aim to achieve through this engagement. (Max. 200 words)
Examples:
• Capacity strengthened
• Partnerships established
• Sectoral or regional strategies co-developed
• Solutions piloted
• Knowledge generated
• Policies informed

Timeline and Readiness (if applicable)

1. Expected timeframe for engagement:
2. Current stage:

Additional Information

Please provide any additional information, documents, or links relevant to this submission.
(Max. 200 words or upload link)

Organization Registration

Authentication & Due Diligence This prototype simulates identity verification, due diligence confirmation, and an authentication step before submission. *

First Name *
Last Name *
Email address *
Password *
Confirm Password *
Name of institution / organization *
Country / Region *
Organization Type *
Organization other *
Function / role *
Organization logo *
Maximum file size: 1 GB

Login

Login / email *
Password *
Remember me

Forgot password?

Connect form

Your name *
Email *
Organization / institution *
Job title / role *
Reason for connecting:
Short message

Scroll to Top